This year, many aspects of the economy will likely be told as tales of two halves. Economic growth during the first half of this year will likely be different than the second half. Moreover, inflation pressures affect the lower half of the consumer base differently than the upper half. As the country adjusts to pandemic reshuffling and rising mortgage rates, we will likely observe greater regional and demographic divergence within the housing market. Overall, the first half of this year will likely drag on 2022 U.S. economic growth while the second half of the year could rebound if global conditions improve. We started this year with a variant strain of COVID-19, and consumers and businesses alike pulled back spending. Before the economy could recover, geopolitical tensions snapped from Russia’s decision to invade Ukraine. Commodity prices rose to record levels, some markets temporarily closed, and fixed income markets responded to a new paradigm. Globally-coordinated sanctions will impact markets for as long as Russia’s war remains. Because of geopolitical conflict and persistent inflation pressures, we revised our U.S. GDP forecast again in March after a downward revision in February. We now expect the U.S. to grow 2.7–3.2% in 2022, as noted in our latest Global Portfolio Strategy report. Last year, as the economy rebounded from the lockdowns, consumers concentrated spending on goods versus services, which translated into an outsized contribution to growth [Figure 1].
As consumers pivot to services spending, the 2022 growth estimate will have support from a rebound in services spending in addition to strong business investment. Consumers likely have pent up demand for services foregone since March 2020. If spending patterns revert to trends, the economy will have $500 billion added to the consumer services component of GDP [Figure 2]. The forecast is also predicated on wage growth from a tight labor market and households flush with cash.
CONSUMER CONFIDENCE IMPLIES WEAKNESS, NOT NECESSARILY RECESSION
Recent consumer surveys point to weakness for the first half of this year but a rebound in the second half is still possible. Both Conference Board and University of Michigan surveys reveal a burden on consumers, particularly from pricing pressures. Surprisingly, buying plans within the next six months for big-ticket items such as cars and houses are at or above trend. The headline Consumer Confidence Index is lower than recent months, but a decline in consumer confidence does not always foreshadow an imminent recession [Figure 3]. The Index fell in the mid-1980s and throughout the 1990s, and recessions did not immediately follow. On the contrary, during the late 1980s, consumer confidence steadily rose after the low point in January 1987. Even though recession risks are rising, the LPL Research base case scenario is no recession in the U.S. this year, assuming the Federal Reserve (Fed) does not overtighten and supply constraints ease, to list just a few risks to growth. The weak survey in January and February is consistent with the overall narrative that first quarter GDP growth will be very low, but if inflation pressures subside and the labor market remains solid, GDP growth should recover in the latter half of the year.
As markets are forward-looking, this move higher in yields due to expected interest rate hikes is consistent with past rate hiking campaigns and suggest we may be near the peak in yields for this cycle. In each of the last three Fed rate hiking campaigns for example, the 10-year Treasury yield moved more ahead of the hikes than during the hikes. The fed funds rate was raised by 175 basis points, 425 basis points, and 225 basis points each of last three cycles while the 10-year Treasury yield moved higher by just 62 basis points, 60 basis points, and 47 basis points, respectively. So that said, as inflationary pressures have broadened this year, and with the Fed likely forced to tighten monetary policy quicker than we originally expected, we now expect the 10-year Treasury yield to end the year between 2.25% and 2.50% with risks to the upside. As this is a yearend target, there is a high likelihood that yields could get as high as 2.75%-3.00% in the near term, depending on the path of inflation over the summer months. If inflationary pressures remain stubbornly high, forcing the Fed to follow through with rate hike expectations, yields could continue to climb marginally higher, which is consistent with history. However, if inflationary pressures fade over the course of the year, potentially resulting in a less aggressive rate hiking campaign, it’s likely that yields could move back down to around current levels, which is our expectation. An additional consideration, though, is if the Fed is forced to hike rates more aggressively than markets are expecting, there is a possibility that recessionary risks are pulled forward into 2023, which could cause interest rates to move lower than current levels. Given the three potential scenarios, we think the biggest move higher in yields has likely already happened but we do think elevated levels of volatility are likely to remain.
Due to a confluence of factors, we expect slower economic growth in the U.S. and globally. Fully functioning supply chains, restored relationships in Eastern Europe, and improving inflation metrics are all key factors for our baseline forecast. Growth in the latter half of the year will likely come from business fixed investment and consumer services spending as both commodity markets and fixed income markets settle into the post-pandemic central bank tightening cycle.
This material is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any
individual. There is no assurance that the views or strategies discussed are suitable for all investors or will yield positive
outcomes. Investing involves risks including possible loss of principal. Any economic forecasts set forth may not develop as
predicted and are subject to change.
References to markets, asset classes, and sectors are generally regarding the corresponding market index. Indexes are
unmanaged statistical composites and cannot be invested into directly. Index performance is not indicative of the performance
of any investment and does not reflect fees, expenses, or sales charges. All performance referenced is historical and is no
guarantee of future results.
Any company names noted herein are for educational purposes only and not an indication of trading intent or a solicitation of
their products or services. LPL Financial doesn’t provide research on individual equities.
All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, LPL Financial makes no representation as to its completeness
U.S. Treasuries may be considered “safe haven” investments but do carry some degree of risk including interest rate, credit,
and market risk. Bonds are subject to market and interest rate risk if sold prior to maturity. Bond values will decline as interest
rates rise and bonds are subject to availability and change in price.
The Standard & Poor’s 500 Index (S&P500) is a capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance
of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major
The PE ratio (price-to-earnings ratio) is a measure of the price paid for a share relative to the annual net income or profit
earned by the firm per share. It is a financial ratio used for valuation: a higher PE ratio means that investors are paying more
for each unit of net income, so the stock is more expensive compared to one with lower PE ratio.
Earnings per share (EPS) is the portion of a company’s profit allocated to each outstanding share of common stock. EPS
serves as an indicator of a company’s profitability. Earnings per share is generally considered to be the single most important
variable in determining a share’s price. It is also a major component used to calculate the price-to-earnings valuation ratio.
All index data from FactSet.